Delhi HC dismisses challenge to CIC order denying details of 2018 SC collegium
New Delhi Mar 30 PTI The Delhi High Court on Wednesday dismissed a challenge to the Central Information Commissions order dismissing an RTI appeal seeking the agenda of the Supreme Court collegiums meeting on December 12 2018 when certain decisions were purportedly taken on elevation of judges to the apex courtThe order was passed by Justice Yashwant Varma on the petition by activist Anjali Bhardwaj In her petition filed in the high court through advocate Prashant Bhushan the petitioner challenged the CICs December 16 2021 order by which her second appeal was dismissed and had sought a direction to the authorities to disclose the available information sought for under the February 26 2019 RTI applicationThe petition had said that on January 23 2019 Justice Madan B Lokur who was a part of the December 12 2018 collegium meeting and retired on December 30 2018 in an interview expressed his disappointment that the December 12 2018 collegium resolution was not uploaded on the Supreme Court websiteHe is quoted as having said Once we take certain decisions they have to be uploaded I am disappointed that they were not In such circumstances in the interest of transparency in the process of appointments in the judiciary on February 26 2019 the petitioner through an RTI application to the CPIO of the Supreme Court sought copy of the agenda decisions and resolution of the collegium meeting held on December 12 2018 the plea had saidAccording to former Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogois autobiography Justice for the Judge the names of Justice Pradeep Nandrajog the then Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court and Justice Rajendra Menon the then Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court had received nod for the elevation to the Supreme Court in the collegium meeting on December 12 2018The matter allegedly got leaked after which the issue was kept in abeyance by Justice Gogoi till January 2019 because of winter break which started on December 15 2018 the book saidIn January 2019 a new collegium got constituted after the retirement of Justice LokurThe new collegium in its resolution on January 10 2019 did not clear the names of Justice Nandrajog and Justice Menon for elevation to the Supreme Court according to the bookThe petition has not mentioned names of any judges whose names were allegedly clearedInitially Bhardwaj had filed an RTI before the Supreme Court seeking copies of the agenda decisions taken and resolutions passed in the December 12 2018 meetingHowever the Supreme Court Central Public Information Officer refused to provide the information on grounds that were held to be not proper by the First Appellate Authority FAA and are therefore not relevant the petition had saidHowever while disposing the appeal against the denial by the CPIO the FAA had held that in view of the subsequent collegium resolution of January 10 2019 it was clear that though certain decisions were taken in the collegium meeting of December 12 2018 the required consultations could not be completed Therefore no resolution was formally passed and hence information asked for could not be supplied to the petitioner the petition saidThe court was further told that in the second appeal the CIC also relied upon the January 10 2019 resolution and held that the agenda of the collegiums December 12 2018 meeting was clear from the subsequent resolution of January 10 2019 and the copy of the decision and the resolution of December 2018 did not exist on record in terms of Section 2 f of the RTI Act and therefore could not be supplied to the petitionerThe petition had sought setting aside of the CIC order on grounds that the petitioner has asked for a copy of the agenda of the collegium meeting of December 12 2018 and not a summary or reference thereof PTI ADS DV DV
New Delhi Mar 30 PTI The Delhi High Court on Wednesday dismissed a challenge to the Central Information Commissions order dismissing an RTI appeal seeking the agenda of the Supreme Court collegiums meeting on December 12 2018 when certain decisions were purportedly taken on elevation of judges to the apex courtThe order was passed by Justice Yashwant Varma on the petition by activist Anjali Bhardwaj In her petition filed in the high court through advocate Prashant Bhushan the petitioner challenged the CICs December 16 2021 order by which her second appeal was dismissed and had sought a direction to the authorities to disclose the available information sought for under the February 26 2019 RTI applicationThe petition had said that on January 23 2019 Justice Madan B Lokur who was a part of the December 12 2018 collegium meeting and retired on December 30 2018 in an interview expressed his disappointment that the December 12 2018 collegium resolution was not uploaded on the Supreme Court websiteHe is quoted as having said Once we take certain decisions they have to be uploaded I am disappointed that they were not In such circumstances in the interest of transparency in the process of appointments in the judiciary on February 26 2019 the petitioner through an RTI application to the CPIO of the Supreme Court sought copy of the agenda decisions and resolution of the collegium meeting held on December 12 2018 the plea had saidAccording to former Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogois autobiography Justice for the Judge the names of Justice Pradeep Nandrajog the then Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court and Justice Rajendra Menon the then Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court had received nod for the elevation to the Supreme Court in the collegium meeting on December 12 2018The matter allegedly got leaked after which the issue was kept in abeyance by Justice Gogoi till January 2019 because of winter break which started on December 15 2018 the book saidIn January 2019 a new collegium got constituted after the retirement of Justice LokurThe new collegium in its resolution on January 10 2019 did not clear the names of Justice Nandrajog and Justice Menon for elevation to the Supreme Court according to the bookThe petition has not mentioned names of any judges whose names were allegedly clearedInitially Bhardwaj had filed an RTI before the Supreme Court seeking copies of the agenda decisions taken and resolutions passed in the December 12 2018 meetingHowever the Supreme Court Central Public Information Officer refused to provide the information on grounds that were held to be not proper by the First Appellate Authority FAA and are therefore not relevant the petition had saidHowever while disposing the appeal against the denial by the CPIO the FAA had held that in view of the subsequent collegium resolution of January 10 2019 it was clear that though certain decisions were taken in the collegium meeting of December 12 2018 the required consultations could not be completed Therefore no resolution was formally passed and hence information asked for could not be supplied to the petitioner the petition saidThe court was further told that in the second appeal the CIC also relied upon the January 10 2019 resolution and held that the agenda of the collegiums December 12 2018 meeting was clear from the subsequent resolution of January 10 2019 and the copy of the decision and the resolution of December 2018 did not exist on record in terms of Section 2 f of the RTI Act and therefore could not be supplied to the petitionerThe petition had sought setting aside of the CIC order on grounds that the petitioner has asked for a copy of the agenda of the collegium meeting of December 12 2018 and not a summary or reference thereof PTI ADS DV DV
