SC seeks Centres reply on PIL seeking harsh punishment for offences against transgender people
New Delhi Jan 21 PTI The Supreme Court Friday sought the Centres response on a PIL challenging the Constitutional validity of a provision of law dealing with transgender people and seeking a direction to provide severe punishment for offences against them Issue notice to the ministry of social justice and empowerment and tag along with the other pending petition said a bench comprising Justices L Nageswara Rao and B R Gavai after hearing brief submissions from the lawyer for the petitioner The apex court was hearing the PIL filed by Chandigarh-based activist Kajal Mangal Mukhi The PIL referred to section 18 of the Transgender Persons Protection of Rights Act 2019 and said that it provided lesser punishment for offences against transgender people Whoever a compels or entices a transgender person to indulge in the act of forced or bonded labour other than any compulsory service for public purposes imposed by Government b denies a transgender person the right of passage to a public place or obstructs such person from using or having access to a public place to which other members have access to or a right to use c forces or causes a transgender person to leave household village or other place of residence and d harms or injures or endangers the life safety health or well-being whether mental or physical of a transgender person or tends to do acts including causing physical abuse sexual abuse verbal and emotional abuse and economic abuse shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to two years and with fine reads the provision The plea has sought classification of offences against transgender persons and setting of penalties in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Penal Code the Bonded Labour System Abolition Act and The Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Prevention of Atrocities Act The provision on punishment for serious offences against transgender people is substantially less severe than for the same crimes committed against others as defined in the IPC PTI SJK SA
New Delhi Jan 21 PTI The Supreme Court Friday sought the Centres response on a PIL challenging the Constitutional validity of a provision of law dealing with transgender people and seeking a direction to provide severe punishment for offences against them Issue notice to the ministry of social justice and empowerment and tag along with the other pending petition said a bench comprising Justices L Nageswara Rao and B R Gavai after hearing brief submissions from the lawyer for the petitioner The apex court was hearing the PIL filed by Chandigarh-based activist Kajal Mangal Mukhi The PIL referred to section 18 of the Transgender Persons Protection of Rights Act 2019 and said that it provided lesser punishment for offences against transgender people Whoever a compels or entices a transgender person to indulge in the act of forced or bonded labour other than any compulsory service for public purposes imposed by Government b denies a transgender person the right of passage to a public place or obstructs such person from using or having access to a public place to which other members have access to or a right to use c forces or causes a transgender person to leave household village or other place of residence and d harms or injures or endangers the life safety health or well-being whether mental or physical of a transgender person or tends to do acts including causing physical abuse sexual abuse verbal and emotional abuse and economic abuse shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to two years and with fine reads the provision The plea has sought classification of offences against transgender persons and setting of penalties in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Penal Code the Bonded Labour System Abolition Act and The Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Prevention of Atrocities Act The provision on punishment for serious offences against transgender people is substantially less severe than for the same crimes committed against others as defined in the IPC PTI SJK SA
