Meanwhile, Former Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray has asked the Supreme Court to restrict Shiv Sena MLAs – “pawns of the BJP” who rebelled against him – from participating in assembly proceedings. Mumbai:  Eknath Shinde took oath as the Chief Minister of Maharashtra, capping nine days of his rebellion against his... The post appeared first on .

Meanwhile, Former Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray has asked the Supreme Court to restrict Shiv Sena MLAs – “pawns of the BJP” who rebelled against him – from participating in assembly proceedings. Mumbai:  Eknath Shinde took oath as the Chief Minister of Maharashtra, capping nine days of his rebellion against his... The post appeared first on .

Meanwhile, Former Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray has asked the Supreme Court to restrict Shiv Sena MLAs – “pawns of the BJP” who rebelled against him – from participating in assembly proceedings. Mumbai:  Eknath Shinde took oath as the Chief Minister of Maharashtra, capping nine days of his rebellion against his... The post appeared first on .

Mumbai Apr 22 PTI The Bombay High Court has set aside the Maharashtra governments notification exempting persons affected by the Nagpur-Mumbai Express Highway project from getting compensation for land acquisition as per the existing market value of their property A division bench of Justices S V Gangapurwala and Vinay Joshi passed the order to the effect on March 24 The order copy was made available on Friday Under a resolution issued on August 13 2018 the state government had decided to consider the ready reckoner the minimum rate of property transactions notified by the government through the revenue office as under the Maharashtra Stamp Act for determining the market value of land However in September 2018 the government issued a corrigendum notification exempting the Maharashtra Samruddhi Mahamarg project from the August 2018 circular A few of the project-affected persons then approached the Bombay High Court seeking to quash the September 2018 notification terming it as violative of their fundamental rights The petitioners claimed that the state government cannot differentiate between projects while determining compensation amounts Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni appearing for the state government told the court that the September 2018 corrigendum notification was issued as 83 per cent of acquisition was complete by private purchase and compensation paid A division bench of Justices S V Gangapurwala and Vinay Joshi however quashed and set aside the corrigendum notification holding that it was beyond the powers of the executive to do so Only because 83 per cent of the property for the project is acquitted it would be egregious not to apply the provisions of the statute for determination of compensation The compensation shall have to be computed in accordance with the provisions and Statute and rule of law shall have to be followed the court said The bench further said that if the lands had been acquired by private negotiation then the compensation paid thereon cannot be the criteria to determine the market value for the claimants who do not agree for private negotiation PTI SP ARU ARU