A $4.1 billion investment in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, one of the biggest chipmakers in the world, has been acquired by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (TSMC). In the three months that ended in September, Berkshire Hathaway purchased nearly 60 million American depository shares of TSMC, according to the company’s regulatory filing with the US Securities […]

Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg spoke to hundreds of executives on Tuesday (local time) and confirmed about laying off employees on Wednesday morning. Washington:  Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg spoke to hundreds of executives on Tuesday (local time) and confirmed about laying off employees on Wednesday morning. Zuckerberg appeared downcast... The post appeared first on .

Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg spoke to hundreds of executives on Tuesday (local time) and confirmed about laying off employees on Wednesday morning. Washington:  Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg spoke to hundreds of executives on Tuesday (local time) and confirmed about laying off employees on Wednesday morning. Zuckerberg appeared downcast... The post appeared first on .

Zuckerberg appeared downcast in Tuesday's meeting and said he was accountable for the company's missteps. His over-optimism about growth had led to overstaffing.

Facebook parent Meta is preparing for large-scale layoffs this week which is expected to affect many thousands of its workforce.

New Delhi [India], September 30 (ANI/PNN): It is evident that the success of any business is integral to the brand and its value. Thus, it is imperative that the brand name should be registered. Once registered, the protection of such a registered trademark is a must for all businesses. Yes! You read it right. Trademark is the foundation of any business. Choosing an appropriate name and ensuring its protection while the business grows is of utmost importance. With time, the brand name gains popularity and people will recognize your business with the brand name, thus choosing the right brand name becomes an irreversible decision for your business.

Jeddah [Saudi Arabia], May 13 (ANI): Oil magnate Saudi Aramco on Thursday overtook Apple Inc, to become the world's most valuable company due to the recent surge in oil prices.

New Delhi Dec 31 PTI The Competition Commission of India CCI on Friday ordered a detailed probe against technology major Apple for alleged unfair business practices with respect to its App Store It was alleged that Apple uses anti-competitive restraints and abuse of dominant practices in markets for distribution of applications apps to users as well as in processing of payments for digital content used within iOS mobile apps The complaint was filed against Apple Inc and Apple India Pvt Ltd In a 20-page order the watchdog said Apples App Store is the only channel for app developers to distribute their apps to iOS consumers which is pre-installed on every iPhone and iPad Further third party app stores are not allowed to be listed on Apples App Store as the developer guidelines as well as agreement prohibit app developers from offering such services these restrictions imposed by Apple forecloses the market for app stores for iOS for potential app distributors the order said According to the CCI this prima facie results in denial of market access for the potential app distributorsapp store developers in violation of competition norms Further such practices prima facie result in limitingrestricting the technical or scientific development of the services related to app store for iOS due to reduced pressure on Apple to continuously innovate and improve its own app store which is also in violation of competition rules the order said Citing these factors the regulator has ordered a detailed probe by its Director General DG Apple did not respond to a query on the CCI probe To assess the complaint the CCI has taken the market for app stores for iOS in India as the relevant one The watchdog said the app developers appear to be dependent on the Apples App Store to reach the app users and app users are also dependent on the App Store to download apps Thus the Commission is of the prima facie view that Apple holds a monopoly position in the relevant market for app stores for iOS in India This dependence of the app developers appear to result in acceptance of Apples mandatory and non-negotiable rules inter alia relating to distribution of apps through App Store by the latter the order said Among other aspects the watchdog observed that Apple conditions the provision of app distribution services on the app developer accepting supplementary obligations which by their nature or according to commercial usage have no connection with the subject of the contract for provision of distribution services This appears to be in violation of Section 42d of the Act Further it also prima facie results in leveraging by Apple of its dominant position in App Store market to enterprotect its market for in-app purchase payment processing market in violation of Section 42e of the Act the order said Section 42 of the Competition Act pertains to abuse of dominant position Regarding Apples averments that it has a market share of 0-5 per cent only the order said the Commission is of the view that the approach of Apple is completely misdirected as the alleged anti-competitive restrictions in the present matter have been imposed on the app developers in the form of App Store policies by Apple In other words the CCI noted that the allegation in the present matter pertains to abuse of dominance by Apple in relation to the app developers Therefore at this stage it appears that the relevant market has to be defined from the perspective of the app developers and not from the perspective of end users the order said Apple has contended that the complainant is likely acting in concert with parties with whom Apple has ongoing commercial and contractual disputes globally andor that have complained to other regulators Besides the company told the regulator that it should be wary of attempts by persons who use proxy parties as a front rather than coming forward in their own name In this regard CCI said that as per the extant statutory framework the informant has a limited role and the proceedings before the Commission are purely guided by the merits of the matter in terms of the provisions of the Act The Commission would intervene in any matter only if same merits consideration under the relevant provisions of the Act The complaint was filed by NGO Together We Fight Society PTI RAM MBI ANU ANU