New Delhi Mar 25 PTI An industry contributing to the countrys economy and providing livelihood need not be closed down only on the ground of the technical irregularity of not obtaining prior environmental clearance the Supreme Court said on FridayA bench of justices Indira Banerjee and A S Bopanna said the Environment Protection Act 1986 does not prohibit ex post facto environmental clearanceGrant of ex post facto EC in accordance with law in strict compliance with Rules Regulations Notifications andor applicable orders in appropriate cases where the projects are in compliance with or can be made to comply with environment norms is in our view not impermissibleThe court cannot be oblivious to the economy or the need to protect the livelihood of hundreds of employees and others employed in the project and others dependent on the project if such projects comply with environmental norms the bench saidThe apex court said there can be no doubt that the need to comply with the requirement to obtain EC is non-negotiableA unit can be set up or allowed to expand subject to compliance of the requisite environmental norms EC is granted on condition of the suitability of the site to set up the unit from the environmental angle and also existence of necessary infrastructural facilities and equipment for compliance of environmental normsTo protect future generations and to ensure sustainable development it is imperative that pollution laws be strictly enforced Under no circumstances can industries which pollute be allowed to operate unchecked and degrade the environment the bench saidThe top courts observations came while setting aside an order of a National Green Tribunal directing closure of industries in Haryana which did not have prior ECAn establishment contributing to the economy of the country and providing livelihood ought 23 not to be closed down only on the ground of the technical irregularity of not obtaining prior Environmental Clearance irrespective of whether or not the unit actually causes pollution it saidThe bench said ex post facto environmental clearance should not be granted routinely but in exceptional circumstances taking into account all relevant environmental factorsWhere the adverse consequences of denial of ex post facto approval outweigh the consequences of regularisation of operations by grant of ex post facto approval and the establishment concerned otherwise conforms to the requisite pollution norms ex post facto approval should be given in accordance with law in strict conformity with the applicable Rules Regulations andor Notifications the bench saidThe top court reiterated that the Environment Protection Act 1986 does not prohibit ex post facto ECSome relaxations and even grant of ex post facto EC in accordance with law in strict compliance with Rules Regulations Notifications andor applicable orders in appropriate cases where the projects are in compliance with environment norms is not impermissible it saidThe top court said that ex post facto clearances andor approvals cannot be declined with pedantic rigidity regardless of the consequences of stopping the operationsThis Court is of the view that the NGT erred in law in directing that the units cannot be allowed to function till compliance of the statutory mandateAccordingly the appeal is allowed The impugned order is set aside in so far as the same is applicable to the units of the Appellants established and operated pursuant to CTE and CTO from the HSPCB in respect of which applications for ex post facto EC have been filed the bench saidThe apex court directed the authorities to take a decision on the applications of the appellants for EC in accordance with law within one month from datePending decision the operation of the Pahwa Yamuna Nagar Unit and the Apcolite Yamuna Nagar Unit in respect of which consents have been granted and even public hearing held in connection with grant of EC shall not be interfered withThe Appellants will be allowed to operate the units Electricity if disconnected shall be restored subject to payment of charges if any If the application for EC is rejected on the ground of any contravention on the part of the Appellants it will be open to the Respondents to disconnect the supply of electricity the bench said PTI PKS ZMN