New Delhi [India], October 14 (ANI): The Centre on Friday told the Supreme Court that the methodology of the electoral bonds scheme is a "completely transparent" mode of political funding and it is impossible to get black money or unaccounted money.

Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India], May 20 (ANI): Chief Minister Basavaraj Bommai on Friday welcomed the Supreme Court order asking the State government to complete the process of ward delimitation and reservation of wards for Other Backward Classes(OBC) within eight weeks to hold the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) elections.

New Delhi Mar 25 PTI The Centre on Friday told the Supreme Court that additional attempt in the Union Public Service Commission UPSC civil services examination is not possibleThe apex court is hearing a plea filed by three aspirants who had cleared the UPSC 2021 prelims exam but could not appear in all papers of the main exam after testing positive for COVID-19 and are now seeking an extra attempt to appear in the examsWe have filed an affidavit Additional attempts are not possible We have considered that Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati appearing for the Centre told a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar and A S OkaThe UPSC had recently told the top court there is no provision for holding re-examination in case a candidate fails to appear in the test on the scheduled date for any reasons including ailment or accident incapacitating him to take the examDuring the hearing on Friday Bhati said the Centre has filed an affidavit in the matterThe bench said it would hear the matter on March 28 and asked the apex court registry to circulated the affidavit along with the paper book of the caseIn its affidavit the Centre has said that the Civil Services Examination CSE is conducted by the UPSC annually in accordance with the CSE Rules notified by the Department of Personnel and Training DoPT every year for a particular CSEIt said the matter of compensatoryextra attempt has been adjudicated by the apex court in the past against the plea of hardships faced by the aspirants due to the COVID-19 pandemic but it was not grantedThe affidavit referred to the judgement and order passed by the top court last year in February and July 2021 on separate pleasIt said after the July last year order a number of representations were received in the DoPT putting forth the same demand of compensatoryextra attemptThe matter has been considered and it has not been found feasible to change the existing provisions regarding number of attempts and age-limit in respect of the CSE it saidThe Centre said that any relaxation to age-limit and number of permissible attempts due to COVID-19 pandemic could lead to similar demands being made by other categories of candidatesIt will also impinge on the chances of other candidates who are eligible as per the existing provisions because it will increase the number of candidates competing with such candidates It will also lead to the similar demands by the candidates of other examinations conducted all over the country it saidThe affidavit said the existing age range for admission to CSE is 21 to 32 years with relaxation for certain categories of candidates and the permissible number of attempts is also six with relaxations for certain categories of candidatesWhile seeking dismissal of the petition it said the existing rules provide for fair opportunities to the aspirants to make an attempt at this examination to secure a placement in case one attempt is lost due to some exigenciesMeanwhile the petitioners have also filed a rejoinder affidavit in response to the affidavit filed by the UPSC in the matterThe petitioners have said they did not fail to appear in the examination on their own volition and were forced not to appear in view of the guidelines laid down by the Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare which specifically require a person affected by COVID-19 to undergo mandatory quarantine and isolation They have said that previously in 2014 and 2015 DoPT gave additional attempt due to sudden change in the syllabusThe rejoinder affidavit filed by advocate Shashank Singh said the petitioners are entitled to a compensatory attempt in place of their missed last attempt due to COVID-19 and absence of policy for themIn its affidavit filed in the apex court the UPSC has said that any decision regarding age relaxation and compensatoryextra attempt in the civil services examination is a policy matter which falls under the domain of the DoPTWhile two of the three petitioners had to leave the main exam held from January 7 to 16 in-between after appearing in some initial papers the third aspirant could not appear in any of the papers due to COVIDThe petitioners have said that they tested positive for COVID-19 in the RTPCR test reports dated January 13 14 and January 6 respectivelyThe plea has said the petitioners could not take the UPSC mains examination after testing positive for COVID-19 and owing to the restrictions imposed under the strict quarantine guidelines of the governmentAlso there was absence of any kind of policy of UPSC which could provide arrangements for such petitioners who were COVID positive during the span of mains examination or before it it saidThe petitioners are approaching this court under Article 32 and seeking a direction to the Respondent UPSC to extend them an additional extra attempt to appear in the examination or in alternate make some arrangement to appear in the rest of papers which the petitioners could not give before the publication of result of civil service mains examination 2021 the plea saidIt claimed that absence of policy and no arrangement to accommodate COVID-19 positive petitioners to appear in the civil service mains examination 2021 have violated their rights including that of under Article 14 equality before law of the Constitution of India PTI ABA SA

New Delhi Feb 18 PTI The Uttar Pradesh government Friday told the Supreme Court that it has withdrawn 274 recovery notices and proceedings initiated against anti-CAA protestors in 2019 for damages caused to public and private propertiesA bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud and Surya Kant said the state government will refund the entire amount worth crores of rupees recovered from the alleged protestors due to the proceedings initiated in 2019It granted liberty to the UP government to proceed against alleged anti-CAA protestors under the new law -- Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Act notified on August 31 2020The bench refused to accept the submission of Additional Advocate General Garima Prashad that the protestors and the state government be allowed to move the claim tribunal instead of directing refundsOn February 11 the top court had pulled up the UP government for acting on the recovery notices issued to the alleged anti-CAA protestors in December 2019 and gave one final opportunity to it to withdraw the proceedings and warned that it will quash the proceedings for being in violation of the lawIt had said that the proceedings initiated in December 2019 were contrary to the law laid down by the Supreme Court and cannot be sustainedThe apex court was hearing a plea filed by one Parwaiz Arif Titu seeking quashing of notices sent to alleged protestors by the district administration for recovering losses caused by damage to public properties during the anti-Citizenship Amendment Act CAA agitations in UP and asked the state to respond to itThe plea has alleged that such notices have been sent in an arbitrary manner against a person who had died six years ago at the age of 94 and also to several others including two people who are aged above 90 PTI MNL SA