New Delhi [India], September 29 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its judgement on the issue of whether it could exercise its vast powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve marriages between two parties even when one of the parties does not consent.

New Delhi Mar 23 PTI The Delhi High Court has waived the six-month cooling off period under the law and granted divorce decree to an estranged couple by mutual consent observing that keeping them tied to a legal bond would only mean snatching away from them the opportunity to lead a fulfilling life A bench of Justices Vipin Sanghi and Dinesh Kumar Sharma said that in this case both the man and woman are well educated and independent individuals who have mutually decided the fate of their marriage and they are at an age where they may start a new life if given a chance However keeping them tied to a legal bond would only mean snatching away from them the opportunity ever to lead a fulfilling life it said The courts observation came while setting aside a family courts order which had rejected the second motion petition moved by the parties jointly under the Hindu Marriage Act on the ground that the statutory period of six months from the date when the first motion was moved and period of 18 months from the date of separation has not expired The man and woman had got married in November 2016 and due to disputes between them they decided to part ways and were not cohabiting as husband and wife since October 2020 The parties had submitted that all efforts of reconciliation and resolution of differences by their family members and well-wishers had failed at multiple forums Realising the agony and pain of an abusive marriage the parties had reached an overall settlement and executed the settlement deed in October 2021 resolving all their pending disputes and claims and filed for mutual divorce The family court however rejected the second motion petition which the estranged couple challenged in the high court The high court set aside the family courts order and said it does not consider it appropriate to remand the matter to the family court since the parties have been separated since October 2020 and they have arrived at an overall settlement concerning all the inter se disputes and claims The counsel also informed us that other terms and conditions of the settlement have already been adhered to Even otherwise 18 months from the date of separation of the parties would expire on April 2 2022 Considering the fact that not even a month is left for that date to arrive we accordingly allow the same and pass a decree of divorce by mutual consent of the parties under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 after waiving the statutory period under Section 13B of the Act the bench said PTI SKV SA

New Delhi [India], January 25 (ANI): The sexual intercourse between husband and wife in a marital relationship cannot be labelled as rape but at the worst, it can be called sexual abuse only, advocate RK Kapoor said while opposing the petition demanding criminalisation of marital rape in Delhi High Court today.

New Delhi [India], December 3 (ANI): An intervention application (IA) was moved in Delhi High Court seeking direction for the registration of same-sex marriage either under religion-neutral law or under secular law.

Chandigarh, September 20: While hearing a divorce petition, the Punjab and Haryana High Court observed that a girl who was married off before turning 18 can seek separation from her husband only through divorce if she did not declare such marriage void after attaining adulthood. A petition was filed by the couple, seeking dissolution of […]