New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice on the plea seeking direction or declaration to declare that “all forms of unilateral extra-judicial Talaq including Talaq-e-Kinaya and Talaq-e- Bain” is void and unconstitutional. A bench of Justices S Abdul S Nazeer issued a notice to the Centre and tagged... The post appeared first on .

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice on the plea seeking direction or declaration to declare that “all forms of unilateral extra-judicial Talaq including Talaq-e-Kinaya and Talaq-e- Bain” is void and unconstitutional. A bench of Justices S Abdul S Nazeer issued a notice to the Centre and tagged... The post appeared first on .

New Delhi [India], October 10 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice on the plea seeking direction or declaration to declare that "all forms of unilateral extra-judicial Talaq including Talaq-e-Kinaya and Talaq-e- Bain" is void and unconstitutional.

Kochi Jan 27 PTI In a setback to the National Investigation Agency NIA the Kerala High Court on Thursday acquitted alleged Lashkar-e-Taiba LeT operative Thadiyantevida Nazeer and Shafas convicted by the NIA court here in 2011 in connection with the 2006 Kozhikode twin blasts case The court allowed the appeal filed by first accused Nazeer and fourth accused Shafas against the life imprisonment sentence awarded by the NIA special court A Division Bench comprising Justices K Vinod Chandran and Ziyad Rahman also declined the appeal filed by the NIA challenging the NIA courts order acquitting two other accused in the case--Abdul Halim and Abubacker Yusuf Nazeer and the other accused were charged with conspiring planning and executing the bomb blasts in Kozhikode KSRTC and mofussil bus stands on March 3 2006 The Special Court for NIA Cases had found both Nazeer and Shafas guilty of the offences under various sections of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act 1967 UAPA and they were sentenced to imprisonment for life In its order the high court said there is no reliable evidence on the preparation or commission of the crime that would incriminate the accused beyond reasonable doubt We do understand the inherent difficulty of an investigation in a case taken over by the NIA almost four years after the incident The Investigating Officers were groping in the dark for almost four years till the arrest of third accused A3 in another blast case the Court observed The court said it has dealt with each of the evidence tendered including the approvers deposition as also the disclosure statements and the evidence of other witnesses to find that the case against A1 to A4 was not proved beyond reasonable doubt The Investigators we cannot but say did not make a concerted effort to go out in the sun to collect independent evidence of whatever version the accused told them In their anxiety to wrap up the case we say anxiety since we do not think the Officers of the NIA would be ignorant of the law on the subject they even recorded the confessions made by the accused clearly inadmissible under Section 25 26 of the Evidence Act the court ruled According to the prosecution nine accused including Nazeer and Shafas were alleged to have conspired planned and executed the twin blasts for reason of bail having been denied to the accused in the second Marad incident communal riot case in which 136 of the 142 accused remained imprisoned as undertrials for about four and a half years On March 3 2006 there were two bomb blasts in Kozhikode Town in quick succession between 1230 pm and 100 pm at two locations inside the KSRTC and the Mofussil Bus Stands The cases were registered respectively at the Kasba and Nadakkavu Police Stations which were then taken over by the CBCID and later by the National Investigation Agency Nazeer suspected kingpin of Islamic terrorist activities in south India was arrested in 2009 and he is currently in jail in connection with various terror-related cases PTI COR TGB BN BN

Kochi Jan 27 PTI In a setback to the National Investigation Agency NIA the Kerala High Court on Thursday acquitted Thadiyantevida Nazeer and the other accused convicted by the NIA court here in 2011 in connection with the Kozhikode twin blasts case The court allowed the appeal filed by Nazeer against the life imprisonment sentence awarded by the NIA special court his counsel said Both Nazeer and the other accused were charged with conspiring planning and executing the bomb blasts in Kozhikode KSRTC and mofussil bus stands on March 3 2006 PTI HMP TGB SS SS

New Delhi Oct 25 PTI A mother-in-law residing with her son-in-law is a legal representative under the provision of the Motor Vehicles Act and is entitled to compensation under a claim petition the Supreme Court on Monday saidA bench of Justices S A Nazeer and Krishna Murari said it is not uncommon in Indian society for the mother-in-law to live with her daughter and son-in-law during her old age and be dependent upon her son-in-law for her maintenance Mother-in-law herein may not be a legal heir of the deceased but she certainly suffered on account of his death Therefore we have no hesitation to hold that she is a legal representative under Section 166 of the MV Act and is entitled to maintain a claim petition the bench saidThe observations came on an appeal filed by the wife of a man who died in a motor vehicle accident in 2011 challenging an order of Kerala High Court which held that mother-in-law residing with her son-in-law was not a legal representative of the deceased and also scaled down the amount of compensationThe Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had awarded Rs 7450971 to the petitioners as compensation but the high court had reduced it to Rs 4839728The apex court said that the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act give paramount importance to the concept of just and fair compensation It is a beneficial legislation which has been framed with the object of providing relief to the victims or their families Section 168 of the MV Act deals with the concept of just compensation which ought to be determined on the foundation of fairness reasonableness and equitability Although such determination can never bearithmetically exact or perfect an endeavour should be made by the Court to award just and fair compensation irrespective of the amount claimed by the applicants the bench saidThe apex court said the MV Act does not define the term legal representative and generally legal representative means a person who in law represents the estate of the deceased person and includes any person or persons in whom legal right to receive compensatory benefit vests A legal representative may also include any person who intermeddles with the estate of the deceased Such a person does not necessarily have to be a legal heir Legal heirs are the persons who are entitled to inherit the surviving estate of the deceased A legal heir may also be a legal representative In our view the term legal representative should be given a wider interpretation for the purpose of Chapter XII of MV Act and it should not be confined only to mean the spouse parents and children of the deceased As noticed above MV Act is benevolent legislation enacted for the object of providing monetary relief to the victims or their families the bench saidThe top court said the MV Act calls for a liberal and wider interpretation to serve the real purpose underlying the enactment and fulfil its legislative intent We are also of the view that in order to maintain a claim petition it is sufficient for the claimant to establish his loss of dependencySection 166 of the MV Act makes it clear that every legal representative who suffers on account of the death of a person in a motor vehicle accident should have a remedy for the realization of compensation the bench saidThe apex court noted that the deceased was aged 52 years at the time of the accident and was working as an Assistant Professor and getting a monthly salary of Rs 83831 The bench said at the time of calculation of the income the court has to consider the actual income of the deceased and an addition should be made to take into account prospects and enhance the compensation to Rs 8581815The appellants are also entitled to interest on the said amount at the rate of 75 per cent per annum from the date of the claim petition till the date of its realisation The respondent is accordingly directed to deposit the above amount with accrued interest thereon at the rate of 75 per cent per annum from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit after deducting amounts if any deposited by the respondent within eight weeks from today the bench saidPTI PKS RKS RKS