In a majority judgment by 3:2, a five-judge Constitution bench upheld the validity of the Constitution's 103rd Amendment Act 2019 saying EWS quota does not violate the basic structure of the Constitution.

Madrid [Spain], September 28 (ANI): A damning report released this month revealed the extent of the Chinese police's expanding global policing toolkit that claims to counter global telecom and online fraud but instead hunts down political dissidents and corrupt officials using illegal methods that circumvent official international cooperation mechanisms and international laws.

Delhi [India], October 27 (ANI): Senior Congress leader Ashwani Kumar on Wednesday welcomed the Supreme Court decision to constitute a three-member committee to oversee a technical committee that will probe the Pegasus spyware case. The committee will oversee a three-member technical committee, comprising cyber security, digital forensics, networks, and hardware.

New Delhi Oct 27 PTI The Supreme Court which appointed an expert committee to inquire into Pegasus snooping row Wednesday said its effort is to uphold the Constitutional aspirations and rule of law without being consumed in the political rhetoric even as it observed that the petitions filed in the matter raised Orwellian concern Quoting English novelist George Orwell a bench headed by Chief Justice N V Ramana said If you want to keep a secret you must also hide it from yourself Petitions seeking independent probe into alleged snooping row raise an Orwellian concern about the alleged possibility of utilising modern technology to hear what you hear see what you see and to know what you do the apex court said Orwellian refers to a dystopian totalitarian state which is destructive to the welfare of a free and open society In this context this Court is called upon to examine an allegation of the use of such a technology its utility need and alleged abuse We make it clear that our effort is to uphold the constitutional aspirations and rule of law without allowing ourselves to be consumed in the political rhetoric This Court has always been conscious of not entering the political thicket However at the same time it has never cowered from protecting all from the abuses of fundamental rights said the bench also comprising Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli The further said We live in the era of information revolution where the entire lives of individuals are stored in the cloud or in a digital dossier We must recognize that while technology is a useful tool for improving the lives of the people at the same time it can also be used to breach that sacred private space of an individual Members of a civilised democratic society have a reasonable expectation of privacy Privacy is not the singular concern of journalists or social activists Every citizen of India ought to be protected against violations of privacy It is this expectation which enables us to exercise our choices liberties and freedom The top court said historically privacy rights have been property centric rather than people centric and this approach was seen in both USA as well as England In 1604 in the historical Semaynes case it was famously held that every mans house is his castle This marked the beginning of the development of the law protecting people against unlawful warrants and searches the bench said Quoting British statesman William Pitt the Earl of Chatham the bench said The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the force of the Crown It may be frail its roof may shake the wind may blow through it the storm may enter the rain may enter but the King of England cannot enter all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement Referring to The Right to Privacy article written by Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis in 1890 the bench said Recent inventions and business methods call attention to the next step which must be taken for the protection of the person and for securing to the individual what Judge Cooley calls the right to be let alone numerous mechanical devices threaten to make good the prediction that what is whispered in the closet shall be proclaimed from the housetops The apex court said however that unlike the property centric origin of privacy rights in England and under the Fourth Amendment in the Constitution of the United States of America in India privacy rights may be traced to the right to life enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution When this Court expounded on the meaning of life under Article 21 it did not restrict the same in a pedantic manner An expanded meaning has been given to the right to life in India which accepts that life does not refer to mere animal existence but encapsulates a certain assured quality the bench said PTI PKS SA SA

New Delhi [India], October 27 (ANI): The Supreme Court Wednesday formed a three-member committee to oversee a technical committee comprising of three members, including those who are experts in cyber security, digital forensics, networks and hardware, which will probe Pegasus spyware case.