New Delhi Jan 30 PTI The Centre is likely to inform the Delhi High Court on Monday whether it wishes to withdraw its earlier affidavit in which it had submitted that marital rape cannot be made a criminal offence as it could become a phenomenon which may destabilise the institution of marriage and an easy tool for harassing husbandsA bench of Justices Rajiv Shakdher and C Hari Shankar on January 28 had asked the Centres counsel to take instructions on whether it wants to withdraw its 2017 affidavitThe bench which has been conducting marathon hearings on a batch of petitions seeking criminalisation of marital rape will also hear rejoinder submissions on behalf of petitioners on MondayAdvocate Karuna Nundy representing petitioner NGOs RIT Foundation and All India Democratic Womens Association has sought a clarification as to whether she shall address the written submissions and affidavits filed by the central government so far or they are withdrawing itThis assumes significance as the Centre in its affidavit filed in August 2017 had said the Supreme Court and various high courts have already observed the rising misuse of Section 498A harassment caused to a married woman by her husband and in-laws of the Indian Penal Code IPCIt had further said that marital rape has not been defined in any statue or law and while the offence of rape is defined under section 375 IPC defining marital rape would call for a broad based consensus of the societyRegarding the petitioners submission that other countries mostly western have criminalised marital rape the Centre had said it does not necessarily mean India should also follow them blindlyThis country has its own unique problems due to various factors like literacy lack of financial empowerment of the majority of females mindset of the society vast diversity poverty etc and these should be considered carefully before criminalising marital rape it had saidHowever in January Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the high court that it was considering a constructive approach to the issue and has sought suggestions from several stakeholders and authorities on comprehensive amendments to the criminal law He had said criminalisation of marital rape involves family issues as well as the dignity of a woman and cannot be looked at from a microscopic angle and sought some time to respond with the governments standThe bench on January 24 granted 10 days to the Centre to come back with its stand on the issueThe court which has been hearing the pleas on a daily basis since January 10 has concluded hearing the submissions of petitioners the Delhi government and some NGOs which have been opposing the pleasIt was hearing PILs filed by NGOs RIT Foundation All India Democratic Womens Association a man and a woman seeking striking down of the exception granted to husbands under the Indian rape lawUnder the exception given in Section 375 of the IPC sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife the wife not being under 15 years of age is not rapeThe petitioners had said that marital rape was the biggest form of sexual violence against women and the Delhi government had said that this act was already covered as a crime of cruelty under IPCThe petitioner NGOs have challenged the Constitutionality of section 375 IPC on grounds that it discriminated against married women being sexually assaulted by their husbandsNGO Men Welfare Trust MWT which is opposing the batch of petitions seeking criminalisation of marital rape had argued that sexual intercourse between a husband and wife cannot be treated on a par with that in non-marital relationships as the issue of consent cannot be divorced from the context of a marriageIt had submitted that the Domestic Violence Act was specifically promulgated for recognising spouse sexual violence PTI SKV SKV DV DV

New Delhi Nov 30 PTI The Delhi High Court on Tuesday sought response of the Centre on a plea seeking live streaming of proceedings on petitions to recognise same sex marriages under the special Hindu and foreign marriage lawsA bench of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh granted time to the counsel for the Centre to take instructions on the issue and file reply and listed the matter for further hearing on February 3The court was hearing a batch of petitions filed by several same sex couples seeking a declaration recognising same sex marriages under the special Hindu and foreign marriage lawsSenior advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul representing some of the petitioners submitted that in view of the rights involved live streaming of proceedings is essential as it concerns seven to eight per cent of the total population of the countryHe further said it a matter of national importance and live streaming can host a larger populationThe high court also issued notice and sought the Centres reply on two separate petitions with one filed by two women who have already solemnised their marriage abroad and seek recognition here and the other filed by a transgender who has undergone a sex reassignment surgery PTI SKV SKV DV DV