Chennai Mar 19 PTI Holding that a rural area cannot be one close to the City the first bench of the Madras High Court has rejected an appeal from a doctor seeking incentive marks for admission in a post-graduate course on the ground that he was working in a government hospital in a rural area The first bench of Chief Justice M N Bhandari and Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy clarified that the incentive marks have been provided to promote the medical services in certain areas which include difficult location in hills plains remote and rural areas Rural area can not be an area close to the city and in this case the Medical College and Hospital where the appellant was working is located within the radius of 10 kms from the city area ie the district headquarters of Tiruvarur If the benefit of the rural area is given to a practitioner serving in the medical college and hospital close to the city the very purpose of granting incentive marks to serve in the rural area would be defeated The purpose to grant incentive marks is to encourage practitioners to serve in rural areas and not the areas which are close to the city or urban areas Therefore keeping in mind the object sought to be achieved for grant of incentive marks the Selection Committee has made a recommendation adverse to the Medical College and Hospital in which the writ appellant is serving the bench said and dismissed the appeal from Dr R Arunkumar recently Originally Arunkumar filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated December 3 last year of the Selection Committee of the Directorate of Medical Education denying incentive marks to him pursuant to a GO dated March 6 2019 His prayer was to include the Government Tiruvarur Medical College and Hospital located in Thandalai village panchayat under rural area for award of incentive marks to him As a single judge rejected his plea he preferred the present writ appeal We do not find that a case is made out for grant of incentive marks Rather it is meant for practitioners who are practising in the rural areas which are away from the urban areas In the light of the aforesaid we do not find a ground to cause interference in the order passed by the single judge the bench said and dismissed the appeal PTI CORR SA SA