Mumbai: NCP Leader Nawab Malik broke the order of Bombay High Court, on the Wankhede Case, and hence the Bombay High Court has demanded an affidavit from him explaining why no action should be taken against him. Justice Milind Jadhav observed that Malik’s statements in the Marathi newspaper were ‘quite serious.’ “What is this, he is trying to impinge our order….,” the Court asked.
The court then said it was prima facie satisfied that the undertaking given to it was breached.

Mumbai: NCP Leader Nawab Malik broke the order of Bombay High Court, on the Wankhede Case, and hence the Bombay High Court has demanded an affidavit from him explaining why no action should be taken against him. Justice Milind Jadhav observed that Malik’s statements in the Marathi newspaper were ‘quite serious.’ “What is this, he is trying to impinge our order….,” the Court asked.
The court then said it was prima facie satisfied that the undertaking given to it was breached.

Mumbai: NCP Leader Nawab Malik broke the order of Bombay High Court, on the Wankhede Case, and hence the Bombay High Court has demanded an affidavit from him explaining why no action should be taken against him. Justice Milind Jadhav observed that Malik’s statements in the Marathi newspaper were ‘quite serious.’ “What is this, he is trying to impinge our order….,” the Court asked.
The court then said it was prima facie satisfied that the undertaking given to it was breached.

Mumbai: NCP Leader Nawab Malik broke the order of Bombay High Court, on the Wankhede Case, and hence the Bombay High Court has demanded an affidavit from him explaining why no action should be taken against him. Justice Milind Jadhav observed that Malik’s statements in the Marathi newspaper were ‘quite serious.’ “What is this, he is trying to impinge our order….,” the Court asked.
The court then said it was prima facie satisfied that the undertaking given to it was breached.

Mumbai: NCP Leader Nawab Malik broke the order of Bombay High Court, on the Wankhede Case, and hence the Bombay High Court has demanded an affidavit from him explaining why no action should be taken against him. Justice Milind Jadhav observed that Malik’s statements in the Marathi newspaper were ‘quite serious.’ “What is this, he is trying to impinge our order….,” the Court asked.
The court then said it was prima facie satisfied that the undertaking given to it was breached.

Mumbai : Maharashtra Minister Nawab Malik has told the Bombay High Court he will not make statements against his family till December 9. Malik has raised many allegations on Wankhedes. This comes amid a division bench court warned Malik. Nawab Malik had levelled allegations of extortion and forgery of documents, on Sameer Wankhede. Nawab Malik won’t comment on Wankhedes now. This was after a division bench of the court warned Mr Malik of an order if he continued to post what Mr Wankhede’s father – Dhyandev Wankhede – has called “malicious” material.

Mumbai Nov 25 PTI Maharashtra minister and NCP leader Nawab Malik told the Bombay High Court on Thursday that he will not post any tweets or make any public statements against NCBs zonal director Sameer Wankhede his father or any of their family members till December 9 the next date of hearing The assurance came after the high court asked the minister whether he has lodged a complaint with the caste scrutiny committee regarding his allegations against Sameer Wankhedes caste credentials and said if he has not done so what was his intention behind the media publicity which it said does not befit a minister The statement on Maliks behalf was made by his counsel Karl Tamboly before a bench of Justices S J Kathawalla and Milind Jadhav after it said that it was inclined to pass an order restraining the minister from making public comments against the Wankhedes till further hearing The bench said that it was apparent that Maliks tweets had stemmed out of malice Why is the minister behaving like this Why should he behave like this we want to know This is nothing but malice Please read the dictionary meaning of malice the HC said The bench was hearing an appeal filed by Dnyandev Wankhede father of Sameer Wankhede challenging the order of a single bench of the high court that had refused on November 22 to restrain Malik from making defamatory statements against him and his family Senior counsel Birendra Saraf who appeared on behalf of Dnyandev before the bench led by Justice Kathawalla submitted that the single bench had recorded in its order that Malik had made allegations against Sameer Wankhede pertaining to his religion and his having received illegal gratification while on duty without due verification The findings of the single bench are that the tweets by Malik had actuated out of malice and animosity and yet no relief was granted to me Dnyandev Saraf said The single judge says that he Malik disregarded the truth and that the documents he submitted in court were either interpolated or not verified he said Saraf further said that the minister had made comments not just against Dnyandev and Sameer Wankhede but against their other family members too He Malik has spared no onemy daughter my dead wife This morning too he has tweeted Saraf said referring to a tweet made by the minister on Thursday morning wherein he posted an image of a document that he called pertained to the last rites of Dnyandevs wife and showed her religion as Muslim Saraf further said that Malik had submitted documents in court casual without verification Tamboly however said that the NCP leader had submitted verified documents before the single bench on affidavit to prove several allegations made against the Wankhedes including the claim that Sameer Wankhede though born a Muslim had falsely claimed in his caste certificate to belong to a designated Scheduled Caste SC category to secure his central government job At this the bench asked if Malik had made any formal complaint before the caste scrutiny committee When Tamboly said no such complaint had been made yet the bench asked why Malik was then making such public statements Any complaint made to the caste scrutiny committee If no then what is he trying to prove Is this for media publicity For claims of caste falsities everyone has a redressal forum the caste scrutiny committee the high court said If there is a caste certificate in his Maliks favor then instead of all this media publicity that he wants everyday especially after his son-in-law was arrested by wankhede why not approach the committeeHe is a ministerdoes it befit him to do all this the bench asked The court further said that if it was obvious that Maliks tweets had actuated out of malice and the same had been recorded as a categorical finding of the single bench then what must logically follow was that the minister be restrained from making further comments until Dnyandev Wankhedes appeal was heard finally by the court Tamboly then sought time to take instructions He said that Maliks daughter-in-law was present in court and that they has decided that instead of getting into a controversy I Malik will not tweet or say anything until the final hearing The high court accepted Tambolys statement but asked why was the ministers daughter-in-law present in the court room when she was not a party to the case Is the ministers entire family involved in this Why is she here the HC asked It however took on record Tambolys statement that no tweets and public statements shall be made against the plaintiff Dnyandev Wankhede and his family members through any means of publicity whether directly or indirectly until December 9 the next date of hearing PTI AYA NP NP