BREAKING! Aryan Khan, Arbaaz Merchant and Munmun Dhamecha’s Bail Plea REJECTED By NDPS Court Once Again

Aryan Khan has been facing legal issues since he was arrested by the NCB officials. He along with a few others was arrested in a drug case on October 3. The bail of Shah Rukh Khan’s son was rejected by the court and he was sent to the Arthur Jail. The legal team of Aryan Khan approached the Session court for a further bail hearing. The special judge said that he will try to give the order on October 20, after Dussehra.

However, after the long hearing today, the court has again rejected the bail of Shah Rukh Khan’s son. The bail plea of Arbaaz Merchantt and Munmun Dhamecha has also been rejected by the court. Aryan Khan has been in Mumbai’s Arthur Road jail since October 8 and was briefly in the custody of the NCB before that.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Suhana Khan (@iamsuhana.khan)

The anti-drugs agency has claimed in court that Aryan Khan is a regular consumer of drugs, adding that this is the land of Mahatma Gandhi and that drug abuse is affecting young boys. As per the reports of a leading daily, the NCB has said that it has submitted the WhatsApp chats of Aryan Khan in court. The police have found drug-related WhatsApp chats that are allegedly between Aryan Khan and a debut actress.

(Also Read: Aryan Khan Drug-Cruise-Case: NCB Submits Shah Rukh Khan’s Son’s WhatsApp Chats With An Actress Before The Bail Hearing)

Senior lawyer Amit Desai representing Aryan said the NCB had submitted no material on how granting bail to Aryan would hamper its investigation, including any communication or chats on alleged drug use at the cruise party that was raided. After hearing the arguments, Special Judge V V Patil reserved its order.

During the court hearing last week, the NCB had claimed that Aryan is a regular consumer of drugs. The agency further stated that Aryan’s WhatsApp chats reveal his links to an international cartel. At the same time, Aryan’s lawyers argued that neither did NCB find any drugs on their client nor is there evidence to suggest that he was about to use banned substances.